Napoleon Series Archive 2003

Re: Reach for your Swords !
In Response To: Reach for your Swords ! ()

Mark,

Another advantage with an author such as Col Elting is that when he did find mistakes that he had made, he published the errata. When I saw that, I annotated my paperback copy of Swords.

Additionally, footnoting every sentence, thought, and phrase isn't necessary. If people don't believe an author, then look in his sourcing, which in Swords is abundant. I've found a good chunk of it because Col Elting was kind enough to give me the twenty-five bound La Sabretache books and I've gone in them to look. Most, if not all, of that material was not published before in English. I've also been fortunate in that Mrs. Elting was kind enough to give me a lot of the Col's notes, finding source material used in the book there.

Weiss' problem with the book and the author is that Col Elting admired both Napoleon and the Grande Armee. Therefore comes the need to denigrate and unjustly and inaccurately describe it through his own personal bias. When asked specifically what's wrong in his opinion, as I have done more than once, he won't answer.

I will have to disagree with you on the use of the term 'primer' for the volume. As an organizational history of the Grande Armee, you won't find its like in English. There's actually more there than meets the eye and much of the material used was primary material, though some of it was contained in excellent secondary sources, such as Martinien, Avril, La Sabretache, Morvan and others. Some of the sourcing I haven't seen used by any other authors on the period. Of course, that might be because of my own ignorance. Rothenberg's book Warfare in the Age of Napoleon could be considered a 'primer'-I don't think either Swords or Campaigns fall in that category. To each his own, though. Good posting, as usual.

Sincerely,
Kevin

Messages In This Thread

Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Better History 101
Re: Better History 101
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Bad History and Relativism
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Rory Muir's "Salamanca".
Early Christmas
Re: Quotes
Re: Early Christmas
Re: Early Christmas
Limits of Narrative
Re: Limits of Narrative
Feu de Joie for Rory Muir
Why Write History?
How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Right Angle
Re: Right Angle
Footnoting
Re: Right Angle
... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Audiences
Re: Audiences
Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Audiences
Re: Right Angle
Re: How We Grow
Reach for your Swords !
Re: Reach for your Swords !
"Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Long Footnotes
Re: Reach for your Swords !
Fair Points
When I was child, I spoke as a child
In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: Limits of Narrative
The Pits
Re: Limits of Narrative
And Good, Durable History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Good Military History