Napoleon Series Archive 2003

Re: Right Angle
In Response To: Right Angle ()

Thanks, Mark
yes, it ought to be possible! and occasionally is, as you say.

I like Julian Rathbone's "Wellington's War", in which he manages to turn the dispatches, usually a fairly dull but worthy read, into a very readable novel accessible to almost anyone.

When I was at university I was trained in the theory that anything substantial that you had to say should be in the text. The footnotes shouldn't be used to carry on side arguments, alternative viewpoints etc. They should be mainly for citations. I think that's a good system, basically. If you've got something to say/argue that won't fir into the text of this chapter, perhaps it should be in another chapter? That's obviously the approach Rory has taken with his historiographic analysis.

This system was not really evolved to deal with detailed examination of primary sources, though, as there was less of that around at the time (when it was evolved, not when I was at uni!). All the same, I like the idea of further chapters rather than huge footnotes - Monty or otherwise. It's a good discipline for writers, I think, to work on the theory that everything has to go into the text. If you can't incorporate it, why are you including it anyway?

Increased enthusiasm for historiographic analysis is an interesting development in recent history. Not sure what it's about. Lack of trust in oneself is part of it, I think, part of the acute self-consciousness of the modern age. At the same time history has never been so excitingly written - the "Longitude" school of thought etc.

Regards

Caroline

Messages In This Thread

Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Better History 101
Re: Better History 101
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Bad History and Relativism
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Rory Muir's "Salamanca".
Early Christmas
Re: Quotes
Re: Early Christmas
Re: Early Christmas
Limits of Narrative
Re: Limits of Narrative
Feu de Joie for Rory Muir
Why Write History?
How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Right Angle
Re: Right Angle
Footnoting
Re: Right Angle
... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Audiences
Re: Audiences
Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Audiences
Re: Right Angle
Re: How We Grow
Reach for your Swords !
Re: Reach for your Swords !
"Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Long Footnotes
Re: Reach for your Swords !
Fair Points
When I was child, I spoke as a child
In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: Limits of Narrative
The Pits
Re: Limits of Narrative
And Good, Durable History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Good Military History