Napoleon Series Archive 2003

Re: The history book I would like to have written
In Response To: Bad History and Relativism ()

Interesting responses!

Here's a test to see whether "period style" makes the difference between good, bad writing etc: (yes, I do know that these weren't "histories" in the terms we have been discussing): Compare a page of the very similar (in intention, subject) memoirs written by each of the exact contemporaries: Gleig, Aitchison, Harris, Schaumann. Compare each of these with a page of Wellington's/Moore's letters. You will readily see (as I'm sure you already know) that style varies enormously among them. There is such a thing as period style, but some of these writers are so dull that you struggle along with difficulty, some vague, prolix, florid, while others are to the point, clear, straightforward, even racy.

I don't believe that in any real terms a gap has opened up between academics and populists. While there is such a gap, it appears greater today because both fieldshave expanded considerably recently. It's not an impassable divide. Some of the best popular books are written by academics - so to pursue the argument, a few terms would have to be defined. Again, as argued elsewhere on the forum, it's more often a question of horses for courses.

One thing puzzles me about the posts - the reluctance to give the laurels to today's writers? I stand by my belief that history writing is better today than it ever was.

A wild card: the book in my own field that I would most like to have written: Leo Steinberg's "The Sexuality of Christ in Renaissance Art and Modern Oblivion." (catchy title, eh?) The book deals with a topic virtually untouched previously but of considerable interest, and deals with it with a wealth of detailed scholarship lightly worn and immaculately deployed; written stylishly and elegantly, with flair; clear, beautifully structured and with meta-historical and meta-iconographic questions well considered and well integrated into the overall structure. Even more of an achievement considering what a difficult, touchy subject it could be if ineptly handled.

Something to think about - the book everyone would like to have written?

Cheers

Caroline

Messages In This Thread

Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Better History 101
Re: Better History 101
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Bad History and Relativism
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: The history book I would like to have written
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Rory Muir's "Salamanca".
Early Christmas
Re: Quotes
Re: Early Christmas
Re: Early Christmas
Limits of Narrative
Re: Limits of Narrative
Feu de Joie for Rory Muir
Why Write History?
How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Re: How We Grow
Right Angle
Re: Right Angle
Footnoting
Re: Right Angle
... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: Only 'quite intelligent'?
Re: ... Left Angle
Re: ... Left Angle
Audiences
Re: Audiences
Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Follow Ups or Spin Offs
Re: Audiences
Re: Right Angle
Re: How We Grow
Reach for your Swords !
Re: Reach for your Swords !
"Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Re: "Full Monty" Footnotes!!
Long Footnotes
Re: Reach for your Swords !
Fair Points
When I was child, I spoke as a child
In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: In defence of Chandler
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: When I was child, I spoke as a child
Re: Limits of Narrative
The Pits
Re: Limits of Narrative
And Good, Durable History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Re: Bad History
Good Military History