Napoleon Series Archive 2011

Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram

G’Day Gents,

Lets see if I may add more confusion to the information that I have already put out.

Sadly I must confess that I have both the translated and French version of MacDonald’s Souvenirs/Recollections. The translated version is very bad, and I should have known better to even use it in the first place, so paint me stupid.

Nevertheless for a fact, the great body of troops was formed in a Colonne Vuide, which was fashioned with four battalions positioned on the first line and four battalions positioned in the second line, followed by 13 battalions in columns on the flank (seven battalions on one flank and six battalions of the other flank) with cavalry closing up the rear of the Colonne Vuide.

Pellet states that eight battalions were deployed divisions to form the head and thirteen battalions stayed in ployed colonnes of colonne serree on the two flanks.

When the military term of divisions are used (whether in English or French), when a great body of troops are displayed in divisions, it means that it was divided into parts. Therefore we have the first and second lines (divisions)of battalions, in battalions deployed or ployed.

The Colonne Vuide is an action column which means that it was destined to fire “en bataille sans deployer”. Hence colonne d'attaque or colonne par divisions (serre) works.

Down at the bottom of Pelet’s book on page 222, (a) there are two ways to read how Lamarque was ordered by the Emperor to form as indicated in the general instructions.

If Lamarque is attempting to explain the general instructions that were written by Napoleon prior to March 17th 1797, before the passage of Tagliamento, only referring to the flanks, then he is referring to the battalions ployed. which I feel he is refering to.

As it stands now, I feel that Hans version of having the Colonne Vuide formed with all Battalions in column is correct.

Unless Lamarque is explaining how the entire great body of troops was formed in accordance to the entire general instructions of March 1797, then the front of the Colonne vuide was formed by battalions deployed. But I not think this is the case.

In either case it was a formation that was considered for the event to be a sound military decision, loses were going to be heavy no matter what lesser formation was used. It had nothing to do with quality of troops or that Napoleon was apathetic to the point that the Soldiers were merely “common fodder”.

Best Regards
Art

Messages In This Thread

Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Vox...
Re: Général instructions.
Re: Général instructions.
Colonne Vuide. Carré Vuide
Re: Colonne Vuide. Carré Vuide
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Buat
Re: Buat
Re: Buat
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: MacDonald's Report.
Re: MacDonald's Report.
Re: MacDonald's Report.
Re: MacDonald's Report.
Re: MacDonald's Report.
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: "... the investigation that General Koch did."
Re: "... the investigation that General Koch did."
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Martinien Online.
Complete Martinien Online. *LINK*
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
French Infantry Officer Casualties during the Napo
Re: French Infantry Officer Casualties during the
Of Possible Interest.
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Résumé de l'historique du 93e régiment d'infanteri
Re: Résumé de l'historique du 93e régiment d'infan
Actually, ....
Historique du 92e régiment d'infanterie.
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de ligne.
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Histoire du 9e régiment d’infanterie de ligne.
Re: Histoire du 9e régiment d’infanterie de ligne.
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Broussier's Division
you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go...
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: you mean it is not dead yet...just let it go..
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: Historique du 112e régiment d'infanterie de li
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
Re: 92e Ligne on the 6th of July
93e Regiment
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram
Re: Marshal MacDonald at the Battle of Wagram