Napoleon Series Archive 2015

Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?

"If he had not fought at all, he would have been Emperor over only France; if he had fought and won, he would have ruled over Europe again—that this distinction is left out by Roberts is confounding."

And in a single sentence the author screams to his audience, "I am clueless and know nothing of what I write!"

If we are going to stoop to this level of journalism, I could post a link to any number of Stormtrooper websites with very detailed histories of how the Rothschild family, with the aide of extraterrestrials, has been in effective charge of the Earth, and were behind the fall of Napoleon. The only difference between the Stormtroopers and this rag is that counterpunch denies alien involvement...

Messages In This Thread

Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?
Re: Did Waterloo need to be fought?