And your evidence for that 'suspicion' is what? Seems to me that you are assuming something that is not in evidence as well as assuming that Napoleon himself was corrupt. Neither assumption holds much water as far as I can see.
Napoleon Series Archive 2015 is maintained by Robert Burnham
Powered by Tetra-WebBBS 6.22 / TetraBB PRO 0.30 © 2006-2012 tetrabb.com
0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr + 0.01 sys = 0.07 CPU)