Napoleon Series Archive 2015

Re: Napoleon and new nobility
In Response To: Re: Napoleon and new nobility ()

The Regnier is question is the one who became duc de Massa, as I said and a quick check with Reverend's "Les Familles Titres et Anoblies au XIX Siecle" identifies him as Claude-Ambroise.

Looking up Kellerman in the same work I find that Kellerman Jr is described as 'comte, puis duc de Valmy' . You probably aren't finding him because it was a courtesy title and not an award but I have seen the title used in Napoleon's Correspondance.

Looking up Lannes (as an example) it is a bit confusing since his heir is only listed as 'duc de Montebello' but there seem to have been three courtesy titles awarded : Alfred is 'comte Lannes de Montebello et de l'Empire (lettres-patentes du 9 mars 1810)' and Jean-Ernest and Gustave-Olivier are both, 'baron Lannes de Montebello et de l'Empire (lettres-patentes du 9 mars 1810). All of them under 10 years old at the time. I think that the 1810 date may have been when the courtesy titles came in, by which time the heir had already got the main titles and therefore his next brother was his heir.

Reverend's work can be a bit confusing and occasionally gets dates wrong but it is still invaluable for sorting out the families and titles. If you can't get a copy, I have all three volumes and will look up anything that might help.

regards,

Susan

Messages In This Thread

Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
and "le soin de pouvoir ...."?
the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps bein
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Sidney Smith
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Wow! Another Excellent Post.
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Gov. treatment of Smith
Re: Gov. treatment of Smith
Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
Re: Maida was not a 'Decisive Victory'
The Failure in Calabria...
Borodino, Lützen, Bautzen, Dresden
Re: Borodino, Lützen, Bautzen, Dresden
Re: Borodino, Lützen, Bautzen, Dresden
Re: Borodino, Lützen, Bautzen, Dresden
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Spot On.
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Baggage
Re: Baggage
Re: Baggage
Re: Baggage
Re: Baggage
Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Indeed.
Re: Indeed.
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Similar Orders
Re: Baggage
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: Caulaincourt
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Re: the silly--and unsupported--claims about Naps
Duchy of Oldenbourg
Re: Duchy of Oldenbourg
Re: Duchy of Oldenbourg
Re: Duchy of Oldenbourg
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
Re: And has been explained to you
By the time of Bayonne
Re: By the time of Bayonne
Re: By the time of Bayonne
Re: By the time of Bayonne
The precipitant of invasion ...
Re: The precipitant of invasion ...
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Slightly different circumstances
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Facts and Research
Re: Facts and Research
Re: Facts and Research
Re: Facts and Research
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
*NM* merci pour la manche *NM*
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
Re: Alexandre vs Napoleon 1810-1811
French Peasants and Russian Serfs...
Re: French Peasants and Russian Serfs...
Re: French Peasants and Russian Serfs...
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility *LINK*
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Lannes
Re: Lannes
Biography of Lannes
Re: Biography of Lannes
Fitzgerald, Lord Robert Stephen (1765-1833
Re: Fitzgerald, Lord Robert Stephen (1765-1833
AR Disney, A History of Portugal (vol 1)
Warre's perhaps?
Pedreira and Costa - Joăo VI O Clemente
Re: Pedreira and Costa - Joăo VI O Clemente
What goes around ...
Portuguese History
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and new nobility
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
OT-With Some Guts Behind It
Re: OT-With Some Guts Behind It
Re: OT-With Some Guts Behind It
Re: OT-With Some Guts Behind It
Re: OT-With Some Guts Behind It
You could go even further if you wished Susan
Re: You could go even further if you wished Susan
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings
Re: Napoleon and the Kings