|
Who Murdered Napoleon? Probably Nobody!By Victor Blair The majority of history books point out that Napoleon Bonaparte died of cancer of the stomach, which took the lives of two of his sisters and his father.� Hereditary factors do play some role in stomach cancer.
The Island of St. Helena has again revealed another piece of Napoleon's wallpaper; this time from his bathroom where he relaxed in� steaming waters, soothing the stress of his captivity.� I feel that I can now summarize all the possible ways that he might have ingested the arsenic that is profiled in samples of his hair without involving a 'supposed' poisoner!� This piece of green wallpaper, appears to be colored in Scheele's green and gold, (the Imperial colors of France) that, when exposed to heat and dampness from his frequent lengthy hot soakings in his deep copper bathtub, would exude arsenical fumes.� This wallpaper can now be added to the green flock paper with a star
pattern, that was used in his drawing room, which was tested and proven
to be Scheele's green.� During the 18th century, the Swedish chemist, Scheele, invented a new color pigment, a solution of copper sulphate mixed with a solution of sodium arsenite which was named Scheele's green.� It has been proven that this 'green' was used in the wallpaper at Longwood House as well as in the green dye in the drapes that enclosed his camp bed.�
In 1893, it was found that when this 'green' wallpaper was combined with a damp environment, a mould formed.� This mould converted the copper arsenite pigment into an arsenical vapor called arsenic trimaythal, which is highly poisonous to inhale.� A physicist using X-ray florescent spectroscopy, which measures the copper atoms and arsenic atoms in any substance, proved that the original wallpaper had enough arsenic to stimulate Napoleon's other illnesses and hasten his death, and did not need the activities of any poisoner.� Even today, the walls ofLongwood House have to be re-wallpapered every two years, because of the dampness on St. Helena, though the Scheele's green pigment is not used nowadays.] Walking from room to room, Napoleon would be now breathing a steady flow of these arsenical vapors on a daily basis for the five and three quarter years that he was to live in Longwood House, and where he remained indoors for most of the last two years of his life, mainly because of the ever prying eyes of his British captors.� If this 'new' piece of wallpaper proves to be Scheele's green, I am convinced that the scales of logic would be tipping in the direction of the 'inhalation' of arsenical vapor.� { If it proves not to be Scheele's green, the evidence presented in this paper still overshadows any poisoner from this hypothetical crime scene.} The poisoning theorists point out that there is a high concentration of arsenic in some preserved locks of Napoleon's hair and that the Count de Montholon was the culprit in feeding these dosages of arsenic to Napoleon by slipping it into his wine during his sojourn at St. Helena.� Surely Napoleon would have noticed the bitter flavor of rat poison in his wine that he liked watered down by fifty percent.� (Which reminds me, wouldn't the poisoner have had to takethat fact into account when feeding the arsenic powder to 'the' Napoleon who seemed to lack taste buds?) Barring the wine, and of course the arsenical vapors from the wallpaper, where else could Napoleon have gotten the arsenic that showed up in his hair in the laboratory tests?� [The accepted natural level of arsenic in our hair/body is one nanogram per milligram.] At that time, arsenic was readily available in many forms and the frequency of its use was unconstrained. Arsenic was used in hair tonic s and doctors used it routinely in many of their remedies for cures of common illnesses. Fish, which are in abundance around St. Helena, contain high levels of arsenic even today, and you can bet that fish was a staple, though not a favorite, on the dinner table at Longwood House.���� It should also be pointed out that, souvenirs of hair samples of famous people were common gifts to persons desiring a keepsake.� To preserve it for posterity, the hair was sprinkled with arsenic powder and then sealed in a vial or compact to prevent parasitic��� damage.� Thus, it was natural that after a certain length of time, the hair would absorb the arsenic powder and give a high arsenical reading when tested in a laboratory.� There is no way of proving that the arsenical count found in the hair, had been ingested through the stomach or if it had been absorbed outwardly through the 'preservation' method, or for that matter, breathing it in through vapors.� In Napoleon's era, arsenic was taken orally in small doses as a 'recreational drug' by Europeans in general, as was strychnine and antimony.� The user got a feeling of well being, strength and sexual staying power.� Is it possible that Napoleon was using arsenic before going to St. Helena and continued its use after his arrival, just to help get himself through the stress of captivity, boredom, melancholy and perhaps his suicidal tendencies?� This is a possibility that seems logical to me! In 1805, ten years before St. Helena, a lock of Napoleon's hair owned by Isabey, the famous miniature portraitist, was tested and found that it had the same arsenic count as hair samples dated, 1821.� Who was poisoning Napoleon 16 years before his death?� Montholon certainly was not available in 1805 to be serving Napoleon glasses of wine.� Maybe the Emperor was just continuing his 'habit' or possibly, just having another helping of fish! The poisoning theorists have recanted that Napoleon was poisoned to death by arsenic.� They point out that he was 'weakened' by the arsenic dosage and that some other malady would eventually take over and end his life.� The most important component in poisoning is patience!�� But, to take all those years to end the Emperor's life, one has to wonder where the sanity of the supposed poisoner, Montholon, was all this time.�� After all, his wife Abiline, left him on July 2, 1819, and took their children (almost two years before Napoleon's death) and returned to the continent alone!�� Montholon wanted to leave with his wife, but Napoleon coaxed her to persuade him, to stay on and look after his affairs. In a recent auction at Sothebys (see attachment #3) of Montholon's unpublished personal letters, he writes to his wife in France, 'constantly begging her to find someone to replace him in his post at St. Helena and enable him to return to France, as he is missing her and their children so badly.� After Abiline had left the island, he noted that he has been ill for five weeks.� The description of his own symptoms is not dissimilar to those of Napoleon.� He suffers pain on his right side and is treated with vesicatories, (blister producers) the same treatments which were administered to Napoleon at the end of his illness.'� The poisoning theorists came that close to almost losing their poisoner! These same theorists also point out that, Napoleon was fat when he died.� In fact, this has become their litany! They emphatically purport that he could not have died of stomach cancer if he was fat, as people with cancer wither away and lose much body fat.� (Though, it must be pointed out that, the eight British doctors at the autopsy all diagnosed that Napoleon died of stomach cancer and signed the official report accordingly.� In fact, the hole found in Napoleon's stomach was called, "a cancer-related perforation of the stomach.") Let's read a few quotes relating to Napoleon's weight from various authors in their books � Walter Geer from his book, Napoleon the First, An Intimate Biography
James Kemble Napoleon Immortal� stated that in Napoleon's last months of life
William Hazlitt's well-researched 1854 book, The Life of Napoleon Bonaparte
Even CaptainNicholls, the British orderly to Longwood House in 1818, wrote in his memoirs,
Where do the poisoning theorists get, 'fat when he died' point of view? When Napoleon arrived on St. Helena in 1815, a pencil drawing by a British captain showed his stoutness, and the report by the British doctors present at the autopsy mention 'a layer of fat' in their findings, though the physical autopsy was done 'only' by Dr. Antommarchi, Napoleon's personal physician.� Dr. Antommarchi's report read� "The heart is in a good state, enveloped in its pericardium, and covered with a little fat." Where should we turn to for physical verification?� Why not go to the written word of the only five persons who stayed with Napoleon until his death Let's look at their names and their personal memoirs . Louis Etienne Saint Denis or also known as Ali, the librarian at Longwood House From the Tuileries to St. Helena
Henri-Gratien Bertrand, Grand Master of the Palace and his wife Fanny Napoleon at St. Helena Fanny Bertrand just four days before Napoleon died,
Count Bertrand four months after Napoleon died, wrote the following letter to Joseph Bonaparte, Napoleon's eldest brother .�������
And from Bertrand's own diary 6 days before Napoleon died,
Louis-Joseph Marchand, personal valet and most trusted servant who had no scruples to gain except his dedication, wrote In Napoleon's Shadow wrote on the 18th of March 1821
Dr. Francesco Antommarchi, physician to Napoleon for just under two years until his death, wrote in The Last Days of Napoleon
Chosen by Napoleon's mother, Laetitia, Dr. Antommarchi would have noticed and reported symptoms of arsenical poisoning, had they been apparent Count Charles Tristan de Montholon, aide-de-camp to Napoleon and the person fingered to be the actual poisoner History of the Captivity of Napoleon
Here, it must be noted, that in all five memoirs without exception, a weight loss is noted, and in some cases, it is very perceptible. I have personally conversed with a few doctors about the ravages of cancer without mentioning Napoleon's name.� They all agreed that a fatty layer around an abdomen in a cancer patient, could be intact internally, even after a considerable weight loss due to a cancerous atrophy to the exterior.� (I have their affidavits as proof!) So, the recurrent perpetuation of the poisoning theorists saying, 'Napoleon was fat when he died' goes in my deaf ear!� What also amazes me is, these same 'theorists' seem to never have any doubts or questions which might throw light on any contradiction to their 'so-called facts,' like saying, 'this is a possibility, not a certainty.'� In my opinion, a lot of their theorem is based mainly on supposition, speculation, and some conjecture. They repeatedly point out that, when Napoleon was disinterred from his tomb at St. Helena in 1840 in preparation to take his remains back to France, the four caskets were opened and his body was observed to be in a remarkable state of preservation after being buried for 19 years.� [Momentarily, let's move ahead to this century, in fact to March of 2001 "When the coffin of Pope John XXIII was opened after 38 years, the Pontiff looked as if he had 'died yesterday.'� None of the body had decomposed and the entire body was uncorrupted by time.� His body was not embalmed."� (Neither was Napoleon.)]�� These same theorists explain that arsenic is a preservative.� But, to be a preservative, Professor Molinaro, a toxicological specialist from the Gendarmerie criminal investigation department in France points out "For arsenic to preserve a body, it is NOT to be swallowed, but rather used externally. (applied to the skin)� What is more, large quantities are required."� Neither of these two conditions was fulfilled in any way in the death of Napoleon! An explanation for Napoleon's preservation, can be explained by the following references From Marchand's memoirs
And from the Hudson Lowe Papers
From Julia Blackburn's book, 'The Emperor's Last Island'
After travelling to St. Helena myself, I found Napoleon's original� grave was nestled in a deep valley where it was naturally 'cool' for this fort-like sepulchre of a tomb.� All the preceding narratives were contributing factors in the preservation of Napoleon's remains.� You be the judge!� Why the poisoning theorists picked Montholon as the assassin, can onlybe justified to me as: They looked upon him as the weakest link of Napoleon's entourage as well as being unscrupulous and unprincipled.� They speculated that he was an agent of the Count d'Artois, brother to King Louis XVIII and was the 'designated' poisoner.�� Though he was the provider and purchaser of the wine from Capetown for the Longwood household, there is no evidence to believe that he would be serving it to Napoleon, as there were appointed wine stewards that alternated from day to day at the dinner table.� In fact, if Montholon was serving the wine to Napoleon, it would have appeared suspicious and surely one of the 'St. Helena authors' would have mentioned this within their memoir pages over the years, but didn't.� That, would seem logical to me! For the moment, let's just assume that Montholon was the server of the 'spiked' wine.� An incongruity of logic is the sudden death of Napoleon's majordomo, Franceschi Cipriani on February 26, 1818, closely followed by a woman and child, both members of the Montholon household.� Some historians backing the arsenic poisoning theory, are now even accepting these deaths as 'acute arsenical poisoning.'� Now, if in your wildest imagination, this be the case, then Montholon was freely handing out his 'doctored wine' to everyone!� Here are some facts that support Montholon's reputation and dedication to Napoleon Alan Palmer's An Encyclopedia of Napoleon's Europe
Would Montholon have taken the time to write the following well thought out statement and send it to Sir Hudson Lowe???�
On page 641 of Marchand's memoirs� In Napoleon's Shadow
From his prison cell in the Citadel of Ham, 1844, Montholon wrote in his own memoirs about his stay on St. Helena
If Montholon really was a Royalist hired assassin, why would he be in prison?� Wouldn't the Royalists be a little concerned that he might verbally open up and 'spill the beans' on the clandestine poisoning on St. Helena?� In my opinion, if he was the poisoner, a financial payoff would be a more fitting reward, than a prison cell! Lastly, Montholon supported Napoleon III's campaign to power as a Bonapartist.� Does this make any sense if he was really on the Royalist's payroll? So, if Napoleon was NOT poisoned to death by arsenic, (and even the poisoning theorists admit to this) how did he really die?� More than likely, he was misdiagnosed by the British doctor, Dr. Arnott who administered an excessive dose of the purgative, calomel. (mercurous chloride)� This dosage, (five times greater that normal) was approved by two other British doctors, Doctors Shortt and Mitchell.� In his last few days of life, Napoleon had been sipping an orange flavored drink, orgeat, (hydro-cyanic acid) to quench his thirst.� Add these two liquids together, combined with the stomach acids and you get, mercury cyanide ..a deadly poison!� It is hard to believe that the British doctors conspired to eliminate Napoleon from life, as it was Britain's position to keep him alive as long as possible because they didn't want to be accused of murdering and making a martyr of him.� [The British doctors even recorded on paper the amount of calomel given to Napoleon a strange way to cover up a murder. . . or was it just a medical foul-up? .Probably so!] I'm sure that this is a disappointment to those of you who are romantics like myself, who would prefer a mysterious enigma to accurate history! Now that all of the above, relating to an arsenic count found in Napoleon's hair, has been made 'much ado about hardly nothing,' where does that leave us?� After all, no one is implying that he was 'murdered' by arsenic it only made him miserable and ill. If you want to create your own conspiracy theory, then Montholon gave Napoleon the drink of orgeat for his thirst, and Dr. Arnott gave Napoleon a large dose of calomel to purge him.� If that was the case, why did Montholon wait all those years to complete his poisoning mission, when in fact it was done in one combined shot, and it was even recorded with the exact amount of purgative administered for the world to see?� A 'bungle up?'� It was more than likely! The piece of wallpaper from Napoleon's bathroom on St. Helena that I alluded to at the opening of this writing, is presently being tested to see if it is Scheele's green.� If this proves to be so, then I feel that the evidence is overwhelmingly pointing to Napoleon breathing in arsenical vapors. I feel that Napoleon died of cancer of the stomach that was hurried along by a misjudged dose of calomel.� (He probably only had a few more months to live.) With this 'paper', I have been trying to bring out the facts from under the clouds of uncertainty, to show them in the sunlight of truth! For a plausible finale, if the poisoning theorists want to do something constructive, they could 'dig up' one or two of Napoleon's other compatriot residents at Longwood House and check the locks of their hair for arsenical readings.� If they find nothing,--- nothing is lost!� But, if they find high arseniclevels in their tests,--- a sincere apology to the descendants of Count Charles Tristan de Montholon, is definitely in order! BibliographyNapoleon the First, An Intimate Biography� by Walter Geer. Napoleon Immortalby James Kemble. The Life of Napoleon Bonaparteby William Hazlitt. St. Helena by Octave Aubry The Hudson Lowe PapersThe Emperor's Last Islandby Julia Blackburn. An Encyclopedia of Napoleon's Europeby Alan Palmer. The Last Moments of Napoleonby Dr. Antommarchi. In Napoleon's Shadow� byLouis-Joseph Marchand. History of the Captivity of Napoleon by Count Montholon.������ Napoleon at St. Helenaby Henri-Gratien Bertrand. From the Tuileries to St. Helena by Louis Etienne Saint Denis. The Strange Case of Napoleon's Wallpaper by Hendrik Ball. The Life of Napoleon Bonaparteby P.C. Headley � �Placed on the Napoleon Series: January 2002 �������������������������
|
||||
|
|||||
![]() |
© Copyright 1995-2005, The Napoleon Series, All Rights Reserved. |
Get Involved: