Russo-Turkish War of 1806-1812
Mikhailovsky-Danilevsky, Lieutenant General Alexander. Russo-Turkish War of 1806-1812. [English translation
of: Opisanie Turetskoi voiny v tsarstvovanie imperatora Aleksandra,
s 1806-go do 1812-go (1843).] Translated and edited by Alexander
Mikaberidze. West Chester, OH: The Nafziger Collection, 2002. 2 vols.
305 pages. Illus. and Maps. ISBN# 1585450952. Softcover. $50. ($25 per
volume.)
I recently received my eagerly anticipated copy of Alexander Mikaberidzes
translation of Mikhailovsky-Danilevskys Russo-Turkish War of 1806-1812
(published by the Nafziger Collection). The translation is excellent
and very readable and the original content thoroughly covers a campaign
I knew virtually nothing about. Alexander has added biographical notes
on many of the people mentioned and has provided annotation in areas
where Mikhailovsky refers to some rather obscure places or events. I
am impressed both with the depth of the annotations themselves and with
the quality of the translation. There are a good number of excellent
maps that allow the reader to follow the action without much difficulty.
For those of you thinking that the
Russo-Turkish war of 1806-1812 is a yawner, there is ample action to
be of interest and the campaign illustrates the difficulties Russia
faced in waging war across vast sparsely populated regions stretching
from the Caspian to Serbia. For those focusing the campaigns with the
French, the study provides the reader with a better appreciation of
the difficulties the Russians faced, as the scope of this conflict definitely
affected Russian military operations in other theaters. The difficulties
Napoleon experienced in waging a two-front war in Austria and Spain
in1809 are well studied. However, the difficulties the Russians had
in waging a two-front war in 1806-7 (against the French in Poland and
the Turks in Moldavia and the Caucasus) have gone unmentioned in most
histories. The slowness of the march of Essen-1s corps to Poland
in 1806 gets new meaning when it is realized that they paused to take
Khotin and secure the right flank of the army of Moldavia before proceeding.
Also, the lukewarm Russian involvement in the war against Austria in
1809 takes on a new light when the Russian commitments against the Turks
and the Swedes are taken into consideration a three-front war. Not
only did the Austrian conflict involve the mobilization of four divisions
in Poland, but it also diverted at least three of the eight divisions
committed to the war in Wallachia and Moldavia to watch the armys back.
Under the circumstances, for Russia to commit to offensive operations
in Galicia while simultaneously engaged in Finland and Moldavia would
be equivalent to Napoleon invading the Balkans while engaged in Russia
and Spain in 1812. Overall, this can be considered Russias equivalent
to Frances Peninsular War a war intended to be quick and easy that
turned into a protracted conflict that required a major commitment of
forces.
Perhaps the most interesting part for readers familiar with the Napoleonic
wars will be the appearance of so many familiar faces. Bagration commanding
in Moldavia for a time, Tormassov conducted operations in the Caucasus
and Kutusov played a devastatingly effective waiting game that finally
brought the war to its conclusion, allowing the Army of Moldavia to
play a pivotal role in finishing off the Grande Arme in Russia. Less
well known figures from earlier campaigns, like Langeron, Miloradovich
and Kamensky-1 (who played important roles at Austerlitz), Kamensky-2
(also at Austerlitz but more noteworthy for his role at Eylau and Danzig
as well as the war in Finland), and the son of the great Suvorov also
appear here, answering all of those "what ever happened to"
questions.
Overall,
this is definitely a valuable addition to my library and is required
reading for anyone interested in understanding the scope and complexity
(the "big picture") of Russian military operations during
the Napoleonic wars.
Reviewed by Robert Goetz. 8/03.
The book can be ordered from: The
Nafziger Collection
Reviewed by Robert Goetz
August 2003
|
Get Involved: